Daniel VanArsdale, 3/2004.
After Holzhausen & Sohege, 1899.
White wins. Vao c2. (4+5) S=N
1. Vc2-g6+(a) f x g6
2.
d6(b)
Sc1-d3 (c)
3.
d7+ Ke8 x d7
4. Kf6-f7 Sd3-e5+
5. Kf7-f8 wins
(a) (b)
1. d6? S-d3 2. K-e6? S-d3
2. d7+ KxP
3. P-d6 S-c5
3. KxP S-e5+ 4. any S-d7
4. K-f8 S-g6+
(c)
2.
... a3
3.
d7+ Ke8 x d7
4. Kf6-f7 a2
5. e8(Q)+ Kd7-d6
6. Qe8-e7+ Kd6-d5
7. Qe7-a3 Kd5-c4
8. Kf7-e6 h5
9. Qa3 x c1+ Kc4-b3
10. Ke6-d5 h4
11. Kd5-d4 h3
12. Qc1-c3+ and Kd4-c4 wins
It may be objected that the Vao is incidental to the revised
problem, being immediately sacrificed to block g6. But no other
piece, such as a Bishop, would suffice, for it could simply wait
for black to play Se5-g6 and then capture the Night. The Vao works
in preventing such a refutation for the same reason that the Pawn
did in the original study: both pieces can move to a square that
they can not capture on. Probably many new endgame themes can be
discovered by adding one or more Chinese line pieces to the board. And as in the
above example, quite a few classical themes may find entertaining
new manifestations.